9/3/2023 0 Comments Kawhi leonard stats![]() PSherman42: The only two defensive stats that are taken into account are steals and blocks, something which even John Hollinger, the creator of PER, has acknowledged as a flaw :īear in mind that this rating is not the final, once-and-for-all answer for a player's accomplishments during the season. PSherman42: We will get back to that, but that's not its biggest flaw, this is: PER doesn't measure defense ![]() Gomez: It makes sense for Kawhi to have low numbers in some categories as he wasn't relied upon to create for his teammates. Leonard actually beats Manu in nine of the 12 categories. ![]() PSherman42: In almost all the categories where a player beats Kawhi, it's by a fairly large margin - especially field goals made, where Tony has almost twice as many field goals as Kawhi. Now let's use the formula to show how Kawhi stacks up against their own teammates: You can find the actual equation used to calculate PER here, but a simpler, if a bit different, explanation is this from Bleacher Report. Gomez decided to offer his take as well.ĭisclaimer: PER's flaws have already been explored by people smarter than us, but we wanted to figure out why, specifically, Kawhi's was low and if it meant anything. I found that part especially interesting so I decided to take a look at Kawhi to see if his low PER was a cause for concern. You should go read it in its entirety, if you haven't already. Tony Parker's probably the best guy to compare Leonard to because they both came into the league so young, but Parker improved his PER from 11.7 to 16.5 his second season. In terms of PER anyway, Ginobili's prime extended far longer than the average fan would guess, for a full eight seasons up to his age 34 year, as he put up something between 21.7 and 24.3 each year. Ginobili had a far more dramatic improvement, from a 14.7 PER as a role-playing rookie to 18.5 his second season to a full-fledged star by 2004-2005, putting up a 22.3 mark. Tim Duncan's PER improved from 22.6 to 23.2 in his second season, and he's perhaps the worst example of the three because he nearly came to the pros as something of a finished product after four years at Wake Forest. Most disconcerting of all, Leonard's PER actually went down his second season, and it's not like the 16.6 he posted as a rookie was world-beating.Ĭompare his numbers to the first years of the Big Three and it's just not a pretty picture. Wilco posted this optimistic piece about Kawhi Leonard, AaronStampler wrote a sobering response about why Leonard was not a star just yet, and he used one of the most widespread composite stats in basketball, John Hollinger's PER, to make a point:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |